Archaeology of Federal State Schleswig-Holstein and Detector Archaeology
More details
Hide details
1
Stiftung Schleswig-Holsteinische Landesmuseen
Schloss Gottorf
Schlossinsel 1
D-24837 Schleswig
2
Archäologisches Landesamt Schleswig-Holstein
Brockdorff-Rantzau-Straße 70
D-24837 Schleswig
Publication date: 2017-12-31
Wiadomości Archeologiczne 2017;LXVIII(68):13-18
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Volunteer involvement in archaeology has a long and fruitful tradition
in Schleswig-Holstein. In the past, this mainly consisted of the
collection and recording of stone or pottery artefacts. Recently, however,
it became necessary to further develop the integration of volunteers
as the easy availability of metal detectors has created a whole new
group of interested amateurs who then often tried in vain to contact
the appropriate authorities.
Since 2004, the so-called ‘Schleswig Model’ has been implemented as
a new approach to the problem in Schleswig-Holstein. This aims at
integrating volunteer metal detectorists in heritage protection activities
and academic research. The volunteers are therefore given theoretical
and practical training and are, of course, informed about the
relevant legal framework. After completing the curriculum, they are
certified by the State Archaeological Office, which is the responsible
state authority. One of the basic legal provisos for the success of this
model is the fact that the illegal use of metal detectors is punishable
by law, and that so-called ‘Treasure Trove’ means that all archaeological
finds of historical significance are declared the property of the
Federal State of Schleswig-Holstein.
Subsequent experience has shown that the model has produced
mainly positive results. Regular contact and communication with the
volunteer detectorists have meanwhile become an indispensable tool
in regional archaeological research. Moreover, ‘enemy’ stereotypes on
both sides have dissipated and been replaced by mutual respect and
recognition. However, the subsequent work required, especially for the
processing of the large quantity of finds (registration, restoration), had
been greatly underestimated. Important new prospects have opened
up with the development of scientific projects that include systematic
surveying with metal detectors, while the publication of the first
groups of finds has, in some cases, fundamentally changed our view
of the Metal Ages in Schleswig-Holstein.
All in all, the author is fully convinced that, given the overwhelmingly
positive results of the ‘Schleswig Model’, which is based on cooperation,
the solution of the problem of the recognition of metaldetector
archaeology as a heritage-conservation and scientific tool at
the interface between amateurs and professionals must lie in clear legal
and ethical structures – and this before it is too late and the system
has got completely out of control.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Axboe, M., Museen und Metallsonden – Konfrontation oder Symbiose, Archäologischer Korrespondenzblatt 24, 1994, s. 231–236.
2.
von Carnap-Bornheim, C., Comment on: Uppåkra – Lund. A central place and a town? Western Scania in the Viking Age (B. Hårdh), [w:] B. Ludowici et alii, Trade and Communication Networks of the First Millenium AD in the northern part of Central Europe: Central Places, Beach Markets, Landing Places and Trading Centres, Neue Studien zur Sachsenforschung 1, Hannover, 2010, s. 112–114.
3.
von Carnap-Bornheim, C., Ickerodt, U., Siegloff, E., Einige Bemerkungen zu Christoph Huts Beitrag Vom rechten Umgang mit Sondengängern – die Schleswig-Holsteinische Perspektive, Archäologische Informationen 38, 2015, s. 323–330.
4.
Dobat, A., Füsing – Ein frühmittelalterlicher Zentralplatz im Umfeld von Haithabu/Schleswig. Bericht über die Ergebnisse der Prospektionen 2003–2005, [w:] B. Anspach, A. S. Dobat, Studien zu Haithabu und Füsing, Die Ausgrabungen in Haithabu 16, Neumünster, 2010, s. 131–247.
5.
Geschwinde, M., Grundlagenpapier Bodendenkmalpflege und Metallsuchgeräte für die Kommission Raubgrabungen und Metallsuchgeräte (29.11.2007;
http://www.landesarchaeologen.... [dostęp 5.5.2015]), 2007.
6.
Geschwinde, M., Die dunkle Seite der Archäologie, Archäologisches Nachrichtenblatt 13 (2), 2008, s. 116–122.
7.
Gumprecht, A., Grabungsgenehmigungen für Metallsondengänger?, [w:] Neujahrsgruß 2005. Jahresbericht für 2004 Westfälisches Museum für Archäologie Landesmuseum und Amt für Bodendenkmalpflege Altertumskommission für Westfalen, Münster, 2005, s. 11–21.
8.
Hingst, H., Das schleswig-holsteinische Gesetz zum Schutz der Kulturdenkmale. Entstehungsgeschichte und Grundzügedes neuen Gesetzes, Offa 17/18 (1959/1961), 1961, s. 181–203.
9.
Hönes, E. R., Über die Zerstörung von Bodendenkmälern durch Raubgrabungen, Verwaltungsrundschau 51 (9), 2005, s. 297–303.
10.
Lemm, T., Ein königlicher Hof im nördlichen Angeln? Der kulturhistorische Kontext von Husby, Kreis Schleswig-Flensburg, Archäologische Nachrichten aus Schleswig-Holstein 2014, 2014, s. 66–71.
11.
Scheschkewitz, J., Merely searching for treasures or valid interest in cultural history? Various motivations in Germany, [w:] A. Lagerlöf (red.), Who cares? Perspectives on Public Awareness, Participation and Protection in Archaeological Heritage Management, EAC Occasional Paper 8, Budapest, 2013, s. 53–59.
12.
Scheschkewitz, J., Wie schützen wir unsere Vergangenheit? Die Arbeit der Kommission Illegale Archäologie im Verband der Landesarchäologen, Blickpunkt Archäologie 1/2015, 2015, s. 20–23.
13.
Schirren, C. M., Ehrenamtliche Detektorsuche in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Ein Zwischenbericht, Archäologische Berichte aus Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 17, 2010, s. 148–158.
14.
Schuster, J., Masse – Klasse – Seltenheiten. Kaiserzeitliche und völkerwanderungszeitliche Detektorfunde der Jahre 2006–2014 aus Schleswig-Holstein, Archäologische Nachrichten aus Schleswig-Holstein, Sonderheft, Schleswig, 2016.
15.
Schuster, J., Sypiając z wrogiem? Potencjał badawczy amatorskiej archeologii detektorystycznej na przykładzie zabytków z okresu wpływów rzymskich i okresu wędrówek ludów z lat 2006–2014, odkrytych w kraju związkowym Szlezwik-Holsztyn, Wiadomości Archeologiczne LXVIII, 2017, s. 19–31.
16.
Segschneider, M., Suchen nach klaren Regeln. Die Detektorgruppe des Archäologischen Landesamtes Schleswig-Holstein, Archäologische Nachrichten aus Schleswig-Holstein 2008, 2008 s. 12–13.