PL EN
MATERIALS
Forgotten Archaeological Sites near Królewiec
 
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Archeologii Epoki Żelaza, Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2022-02-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-03-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-05-24
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-12-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Agata Chilińska-Früboes   

Zakład Archeologii Epoki Żelaza, Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Gołębia 11, 31-007, Kraków, Polska
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT

Burial grounds discovered on the Samland Peninsula often form clusters. One of the larger clusters, including also cemeteries from the Roman Period, was found slightly west of Królewiec (Germ. Königsberg, Rus. Kaliningrad), near the former villages of Groß Friedrichsberg and Juditten, as well as Friedrichswalde (Fig. 1).

I. Juditten site 1

The first discoveries in the area in question took place around the mid-19th century. In 1868, the Physical-economic Society (Physikalisch-ökonomische Gesellschaft) donated to the Antiquity Society (Alterthumsgesellschaft Prussia) a spur previously received from Charisius, a landowner from Friedrichswalde. The artefact had supposedly been found in the forest. A little later, in 1887, the Prussia-Museum purchased an amber bead as well as bronze tongs and an “ear spoon”, suspended on a bronze ring, likewise found by chance in the forest (Fig. 2). Thus, it is most likely that the Juditten forest contained a Roman Period cemetery, which should be attributed to the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture.

II. Juditten site 2 (Gottschedstraße 13)

A note by the then director of the Prussia-Museum, Wilhelm Gaerte, shows that on 10 May 1933, the aforementioned Charisius informed him that 21 pottery sherds (II/1) and a fragment of amber (II/2) had been found between Gottschedstraße and Kirchenstraße. Three days later, Gaerte wrote a letter to Bachler, the owner of the area, requesting that he agree to conducting test excavations before commencing his planned construction work. The survey was carried out between the 7th and 9th of June by Fritz Jaensch, and the 9th and 10th of August by Walter Nowothnig. Jaensch probably discovered eight features (Fig. 3, 4), most likely graves (II/4−10), while Nowothnig uncovered further features (II/11–18; Fig. 5, 6). In September 1933, in response to a letter from the local authorities, Gaerte stated that the excavations had been concluded, and further research would not be carried out, as the site had already been built over. The excavated site was most likely a severely damaged cemetery. The researchers uncovered several (three to eleven) graves. All but one were probably destroyed cremation graves, containing fragments of burnt bones and pottery. The earthenware recovered from one of the graves (feature II) was described by Nowothnig as ordenzeitlicher Scherben, providing the basis for dating the grave to the Middle Ages. The chronology of the other cremation graves cannot be established. They may have been associated with the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture, as one inhumation grave was also discovered at the site (feature 7; Fig. 4:3). On the basis of a Prussian series eye brooch found within (II/9.1), the grave in question should be dated to phase B2.

III. Juditten site 3 (Am Stadtwald)

A few days after concluding his excavations at Gottschedstraße, Nowothnig returned to Juditten, where, on the 16th and 17th of August, he investigated a site located in an undeveloped area on Am Stadwald Street, near its intersection with Hammerweg. Nowothnig established eight test trenches (Fig. 7), in all of which he observed scattered pottery sherds, whose chronology, however, he was unable to determine. In the same year, while digging the foundations of a house near this site, the building contractor Steputat noticed an oval pit with a dark fill, containing pottery fragments and charcoal. He reported the discovery to Gaerte, who visited the site and concluded that there had once been a settlement there. He also identified the aforementioned pit as the remains of the basement of a burnt-down house (III/4). Gaerte undertook excavations at this place, which yielded the remains of two similar houses (III/5.6). Gaerte’s work probably covered another part of the same site previously investigated by Nowothnig—most likely the remains of a medieval or modern settlement, probably the same settlement as the one discovered and explored during World War I on both sides of Am Stadtwald Street, near the Packhäuser café (Fig. 8).

IV. Groß Friedrichsberg site 1

The best-known site from this area is a flat cremation cemetery from the Early Middle Ages, with features that should be interpreted as Aschenplatz. It was located near the village of Juditten, however, in the literature, material from this cemetery is labelled as Friedrichsberg or Gross (Groß) Friedrichsberg. First artefacts, discovered during the sand digging in the late 19th century, were donated to the Ostpreussischer Provinzialmuseum in Königsberg (IV/1), as well as to the former Museum für Vorgeschichte in Berlin (IV/2−71), by the local landowner Douglas. In 1888, sand extraction at the site was already under the supervision of Otto Tischler from the Physikalisch-ökonomische Gesellschaft in Königsberg. He found the presence of the so-called Aschenschicht, i.e. a layer of burnt debris containing scattered cremated human bones as well as artefacts—primarily elements of weaponry (including swords and spearheads), horse bits, stirrups, but also penannular brooches, buckles, fragments of scales, weights, pieces of bronze bowls and, what Tischler thought was unique, an unusually large number of earthenware vessels and their sherds; the most spectacular find was a gilded bronze helmet (V/72; Fig. 16). What is more, the site yielded human and horse inhumation graves, which, according to Tischler, were of the same chronology as the aforementioned Aschenschicht. The material obtained by Tischler was given to the Ostpreussischer Provinzialmuseum (IV/72−124) and the Museum für Vorgeschichte.

Cemeteries with features described as Aschenplatz or Aschenschicht are dated to the 10th/11th−13th century. They are known primarily from the Samland Peninsula and Courland; however, they are also encountered sporadically in other regions, including the Elbląg Upland, the Masurian Lakeland and, possibly, the Middle Nemunas Basin. The cemeteries feature layers of burnt debris, containing cremated human bones and numerous elements of weaponry and horse tack, as well as less numerous adornments, elements of scales and pottery sherds. It is assumed that only warriors were buried at such cemeteries. It is assumed that only warriors were buried at such cemeteries. Sometimes horse graves were found underneath the burnt layer. On the Samland Peninsula, Aschenplatz are often discovered within older cemeteries of the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture, where they destroyed graves from the Roman and Migration Periods. This indicates that the people who buried their dead there in the Early Middle Ages were either unaware of the existence of older graves or were aware but considered them unimportant.

V. Groß Friedrichsberg site 2

In July 1922, Wilhelm Gaerte received information that a cemetery had been discovered near the houses of farm workers in Groß Friedrichsberg near Juditten. The local landowner Douglas then presented to the Prussia-Museum artefacts dating to the Roman Period (V/1–3), including two coins and a bronze brooch, found during ploughing that further revealed patches of black soil (schwarze Stellen) and stones—presumably destroyed cremation graves. According to Gaerte, who visited the site on 22 October 1922, other finds (from the Late Roman Period), namely two large amber beads (V/4) and four small clay vessels (V/5), also came from the same spot.

A few years later, on 11 and 12 June 1929, the site—a flat cemetery of the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture—was excavated by Carl Engel, member of the Alterthumsgesellschaft Prussia in Königsberg. The material he discovered came from the entire Roman Period as well as the early phase of the Migration Period. He uncovered 35 thirty features, most of which were graves destroyed by ploughing (Figs. 15–24). 19 of them, with feature 10 (Pls. 17–22) containing two cinerary urns (burials 10a and 10b), were urn graves. In five or six urn graves, the urns were large, bucket-shaped vessels (Eimerurnen) (features 1, 8, 9, 14?, 16, 20); two or three of them were accompanied by accessory vessels (features 9, 14?, 16). Among the urns, there were also a vessel with a double handle (feature 10a; Fig. 21:1), a vessel decorated with an applied strip of clay and handles arranged around the body (feature 10b; Fig. 22:3), and a vessel with a globular body (feature 5; Fig. 15:2). At least one of the explored features (No. 11) should be interpreted as a cremation pit grave, while six other features (H, I, K, L, M, N) were cremation graves, but it cannot be determined whether they were urn or pit burials. Feature 10 is especially worthy of note, as, in addition to the urned cremation burials (10a, 10b), it contained a human (10c) and horse (10d) inhumation burials. These are the only such burials discovered at Groß Friedrichsberg. The human skeleton lay underneath a stone pavement on which the aforementioned two urns were placed; the horse burial was located below it. The grave is dated to phase B2/C1–C1a. Additionally, five pits filled with the remains of a pyre (features A–E), without bones or grave goods, may have been either destroyed graves or pyres (However, so far the latter are unknown in the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture area). Feature 18 contained only a stone pavement (Fig. 23:2) and was probably not a grave. The same applies to features 21a, F, and G which yielded only vessels or their fragments.

It seems that the cemetery of the Dollkeim-Kovrovo culture was established in phase B2/C1–C1a or, perhaps, slightly earlier, already in phase B2 (features 5, 10 and 21). Grave 16 should probably be dated to phase C1, grave 9 most likely to phase C2, grave 20 to phases C1–C2, and graves 1, 8 and 14 only broadly from phase B2/C1–C1a to phase E. However, the dating of as many as 26 of the 35 explored features cannot be determined.

VI. Groß Friedrichsberg site 3

On 7 October 1927, a fragment of a stone quern (VI/1) was found on the road to Juditten. A mention of this find as well as a map marking the place of its discovery have been preserved in the archives of the Prussia-Museum. The dating of the artefact cannot be determined.

VII. Friedrichswalde site 1

On 27 November 1903, Heinrich Kemke from the Prussia-Museum and Dr. Strehl, unknown to us, conducted a one-day excavations at a destroyed cemetery presumably from the Early Roman Period. The site was located about 120 m west of an old mill. In 1910, Charisius sent a letter to Kemke informing him that while ploughing a field east of the road, he had discovered a number of dark spots of about one square meter and earlier, near the same road, he had found many black (burnt?) stones and three pottery sherds (VII/1). It is highly likely that Charisius described the site investigated by Kemke and Strehl seven years earlier—most likely a destroyed cemetery of the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture.

VIII. Friedrichswalde site 2

In August 1936, Charisius donated to the Prussia-Museum a fragment of a stone axe (VIII/1) discovered while harrowing a field.

IX. Friedrichswalde site 3

Also from Friedrichswalde comes a bronze bowl (IX/1), known only from brief mentions. Engel dated it to phase I. Possibly It was a Hanseatic bowl. In the areas inhabited by Prussians in the 11th–13th centuries, such bowls were used by local elites as tableware.

Conclusions

The oldest find from the area in question is the stone axe discovered at Friedrichswalde 2. It may date back to the Stone Age, Bronze
Age or Early Iron Age. Four or five sites should be associated with the Roman Period and perhaps also the Migration Period—these are the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture cemeteries at Juditten 1 and 2, Groß Friedrichsberg 1 and 2, and Friedrichswalde 1. All these sites were destroyed and, with the exception of Groß Friedrichsberg 2, yielded few finds. Other material from the analysed area should be linked to the Early Middle Ages. The most abundant finds come from the Aschenplatz at Groß Friedrichsberg 1, dated to the 9th/10th–13th century. The remains of a destroyed medieval cemetery were perhaps also encountered at Juditten 2. The chronology of these sites corresponds to the dating of the possible Hanseatic bowl discovered at Friedrichswalde 3. The remains of medieval or modern settlements were probably found at Juditten 2 and 3.

The above summary shows that the analysed area, currently located within and slightly west of Kaliningrad, was intensively settled at least from the Early Roman Period up to modern times. It is usually assumed in the literature that the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture cemeteries established in the Early Roman Period were used continuously for about a thousand years. It has been repeatedly pointed out, however, that very little material from these sites comes from the period between phases E and H. It seems then that it is not possible to speak of continuous use of cemeteries from the Roman Period to the Early Middle Ages. From around the 8th century, cemeteries on the Samland Peninsula disappear. It is not until the end of the 10th/beginning of the 11th century that new Prussian cemeteries, featuring, among others, Aschenplatz-type structures, begin to be established there, destroying the older cemeteries of the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture in the process. So far, such a hiatus in the use of the site has been proven, for example, for the Putilovo cemetery. Studies on the Dollkeim-Kovrovo Culture are difficult due to the nature of the sources, which are still primarily archival materials—incomplete and scattered over many institutions. However, their analysis is important and, as in the case of the studies presented in this text, each time sheds new light on the “old” discoveries.
REFERENCES (106)
1.
CAEG: Spuścizna naukowa Carla Engla przechowywana w Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen.
 
2.
DSHI 100 La Baume 9: Spuścizna naukowa Herberta Jankuhna (część włączona do archiwum Wolfganga La Baume’a), przechowywana w Herder-Institut für historische Ostmitteleuropaforschung – Institut der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, Marburg.
 
3.
DSHI 100 Engel: Spuścizna naukowa Carla Engla przechowywana w Herder-Institut für historische Ostmitteleuropaforschung – Institut der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, Marburg.
 
4.
C. Engel, Spuścizna: Spuścizna naukowa Carla Engla przechowywana w Museum für Archäologie, Schleswig.
 
5.
R. Grenz, spuścizna: Spuścizna naukowa Rudolfa Grenza przechowywana w Museum für Archäologie, Schleswig.
 
6.
H. Jankuhn, spuścizna: Spuścizna naukowa Herberta Jankuhna przechowywana w Museum für Archäologie, Schleswig.
 
7.
M. Schmiedehelm, spuścizna: Spuścizna naukowa Marty Schmiedehelm przechowywana w Tallinna Ülikooli Arheoloogiline Teaduskogu, Tallinn.
 
8.
SMB-PK/MVF, PM-IXd8, PM-A: Spuścizna naukowa Prussia-Museum przechowywana w MVF.
 
9.
SMB-SPK/MVF, IXc: Spuścizna naukowa Museum für Volkerkunde przechowywana w MVF.
 
10.
Anonim 1924: Branderde, Urnenscherben, Knochen und eine Sprossenfibel freigelegt. Tagung des Verbandes Ostmärkischer Heimatmuseen in Königsberg, „Königsberger Allgemeine Zeitung” 303, 02.07.1924.
 
11.
Almgren O. 1897: Studien über Nordeuropäische Fibelformen der ersten nach christlichen Jahrhunderte mit Berücksichtigung der provinzialrömischen und südrussischen Formen, Stockholm1 [Ivar Haeggström].
 
12.
Andrzejowski J., Cieśliński A. 2007: Germanie i Bałtowie u schyłku starożytności. Przyjazne związki czy wrogie sąsiedztwo?, [w:] A. Bitner-Wróblewska (red.), Kultura bogaczewska w 20 lat później. Materiały z konferencji, Warszawa, 26–27 marca 2003, Seminarium Bałtyjskie I, Warszawa [PMA], 279–319.
 
13.
Andrzejowski J., Madyda-Legutko R. 2013: Bronze belt buckles with double tongue between Scandinavia and the Black Sea. In Search of local and inter-regional connections during the Roman Period, [w:] I. Khrapunov, F-A. Stylegar (red.), Inter Ambo Maria. Northern Barbarians from Scandinavia towards the Black Sea, Kulturhistoriske rapporter 15, Kristiansand-Simferopol [Dolya], 6–25.
 
14.
Andrzejowski J., Madyda-Legutko R. 2018: Zur Mobilität von Kriegern am Übergang von der älteren zur jüngeren Römischen Kaiserzeit im Lichte der Verbreitung der Doppeldornschnallen, „Študijné zvesti Archeologického ústavu Slovenskej akadémie vied” 64, 55–80.
 
15.
Baranowski T. 1973: Rząd koński z wodzami łańcuchowymi na terenie Europy Środkowej w okresie wpływów rzymskich, APolski XVIII/2, 391–473.
 
16.
La Baume W. 1939: Frühgeschichtliche Helme aus Ostpreußen, „Nachrichtenblatt für deutsche Vorzeit” 15/11–12, 296–300.
 
17.
La Baume W. 1944: Altpreußisches Zaumzeug aus dem Landesamt für Vorgeschichte in Königsberg (Pr), „Alt-Preußen” 9/1–2, 2–19.
 
18.
Bech J.-H. 1996: Keramikken på Slusegård-Gravpladsen, [w:] B.M. Rasmussen, P.H. Andersen, P. Kjærum (red.), Slusegårdgravpladsen IV. Keramikken. Tekstilerne. Skeletterne. De brændte knogler. Tænderne, Jysk Arkæologisk Selskabs Skrifter XIV/4, Højbjerg [Aarhus Universitetetsforlag], 9–121.
 
19.
Beckmann Ch. 1969: Metallfingerringe der römischen Kaiserzeit im freien Germanien, SJahr. XXVI, 5–106.
 
20.
Bezzenberger A. 1909: Gräberfeld verschiedener Perioden bei Schuditten, Kr. Fischhausen, Prussia 22 (1900–1904), 44–63.
 
21.
Bezzenberger A., Peiser F.A. 1914: Gräberfeld bei Bludau, Kr. Fischhausen, Prussia 23/I (1905–1908), 210–249.
 
22.
Bujack G. 1888: Die Accession des Prussia-Museums pro 1887, Prussia 13 (1886/87), 195–272.
 
23.
Bujack G. 1889: Accessionen des Prussia-Museums pro 1888, Prussia 14 (1887/88), 260–299.
 
24.
Bujack G. 1890: Accessionen des Prussia-Museums pro 1889, Prussia 15 (1888/89), 163–194.
 
25.
Bujack G. 1891: Accessionen des Prussia-Museums pro 1890, Prussia 16 (1890), 8–40.
 
26.
Bursche A. 1992: Roman Coinage in the Westbalt Circle, [w:] J. Okulicz-Kozaryn, W. Nowakowski (red.), Studia z archeologii ludów barbarzyńskich z wybrzeży Bałtyku i dorzecza Wisły, Barbaricum’92 (2), Warszawa [UW], 231–244.
 
27.
Chilińska A. 2009: „Jede Grabung hat noch stets etwas Neues gebracht”. Wczesnorzymskie materiały pochodzące z cmentarzyska kultury Dollkeim-Kovrovo w Corjeiten/Putilovo na Sambii, mps pracy magisterskiej, archiwum Wydziału Archeologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
 
28.
Chilińska-Drapella A. 2010: Próba nowego spojrzenia na „pasy sambijskie”, WA LXI (2009–2010), 3–79.
 
29.
Chilińska-Drapella A. 2013: Unknown cemeteries at Corjeiten/Putilovo in the Samland Peninsula, [w:] Н.А. Макаров, А.В. Мастыкова, А.Н. Хохлов (red.), Археология Балтийского региона, Москва/Санкт-Петербург [Нестор-История], 49–59.
 
30.
Chilińska-Früboes A. 2015: Rzymska fibula z d. Kirpehnen, [w:] B. Kontny (red.), Ubi tribus faucibus fluenta Vistulae fluminis ebibuntur. Jerzy Okulicz-Kozaryn in memoriam, ŚWIATOWIT Suppl. Series B: Barbaricum 11, Warszawa [IA UW], 99–113.
 
31.
Chilińska-Früboes A. 2017: Zapinki oczkowate serii pruskiej z terenu kultury Dollkeim-Kovrovo, WA LXVIII, 45–106.
 
32.
Chilińska-Früboes A. 2020: Fibel, Tracht und Interkulturalität. Die Dollkeim/Kovrovo-Kultur der älteren Römischen Kaiserzeit im nördlichen Ostpreußen, Studien zur Siedlungsgeschichte und Archäologie der Ostseegebiete 18/1–2, Kiel [Wachholtz].
 
33.
Chilińska-Früboes A. 2021: Looking for lost pieces of a puzzle: the Dollkeim-Kovrovo culture cemetery at Perdollen, „Archaeologia Baltica” 28, 175–216.
 
34.
Cieśliński A. 2000: Zapinki kolankowate z Prussia Museum, czyli o możliwościach przywrócenia do obiegu naukowego zabytków ze zbiorów królewieckich, „Światowit” II (LXIII), fasc. B, 53–64.
 
35.
Czarnecka K. 1989: Ein Ring aus Roggendorf in Niederösterreich und seine kaiserzeitlichen Parallelen im Barbaricum, „Fundberichte aus Österreich” 27 (1988), 11–17.
 
36.
Dąbrowski J. 1968: Zabytki metalowe epoki brązu między dolną Wisłą a Niemnem, Wrocław [Ossolineum].
 
37.
Engel C. 1929a: Wertvolle Funde bei Königsberg. Ausgrabung bei Groß-Friedrichsberg, „Königsberger Hartungsche Zeitung” 278, 17.06.1929.
 
38.
Engel C. 1929b: Gräberfeld bei Groß-Friedrichsberg. Ausgrabungen durch das Prussia-Museum, „Königsberger Hartungsche Zeitung” 287, 22.06.1929.
 
39.
Engel C. 1930: Tätigkeitsbericht des Prussia-Museums in Königsberg (Ostpreußen) für das Jahr 1929, „Nachrichtenblatt für deutsche Vorzeit” VI/1, 3–8.
 
40.
Engel C. 1931a: Beiträge zur Gliedrung des jüngsten heidnischen Zeitalters in Ostpreussen, [w:] Congressus Secundus Archaeologorum Balticorum Rigae, 19.–23.VIII.1930, Acta Universitatis Latviensis. Philologorum et Philosophorum Ordinis Series I, Suppl. I, Rigae [Valstspapiru Spiestuve], 313–336.
 
41.
Engel C. 1931b: Das Gräberfeld von Sanditten, Kr. Wehlau, Prussia 29, 47–64.
 
42.
Engel C. 1933: Die kaiserzeitlichen Kulturgruppen zwischen Weichsel und finnischem Meerbusen und ihr Verhältnis zueinander, Prussia 30/I, 261–286.
 
43.
Engel C. 1935a: Aus ostpreußischer Vorzeit, Königsberg [Gräfe und Unzer].
 
44.
Engel C. 1935b: Vorgeschichte der altpreußischen Stämme. Untersuchungen über Siedlungsstetigkeit und Kulturgruppen im vorgeschichtlichen Ostpreußen, tom I, Königsberg Pr. [Gräfe und Unzer].
 
45.
Engel M., Sobczak C. 2019: Ozdobne okucia hełmów wczesnośredniowiecznych z zespołu osadniczego w Szurpiłach, „Acta Militaria Mediaevalia” XV, 65–84.
 
46.
Gaerte W. 1923: Ein altpreußischer oder mongolischer Helm?, „Zeitschrift für historische Waffen- und Kostümkunde” NF 1 (=X)/2–3, 41, 137.
 
47.
Gaerte W. 1924: Die Besiedlung und Kultur Königsbergs und seiner Umgebung in vorgeschichtlicher Zeit, „Altpreußische Forschungen” 1/1, 97–144.
 
48.
Gaerte W. 1928: Skelettgräber zwischen Weichsel und Memel aus der römischen Kaiserzeit. Zur ostpreußischen Gotenfrage, [w:] Festgabe für den 70jährigen Gustaf Kossinna von Freunden und Schülern, „Mannus” Erg.Bd. VI, Leipzig [Curt Kabitzsch], 45–48.
 
49.
Gaerte W. 1929: Urgeschichte Ostpreußens, Königsberg [Gräfe und Unzer].
 
50.
Gaerte W. 1933: Juditten in vorgeschichtlicher Zeit, „Königsberger Hartungsche Zeitung” 296, 27.06.1933.
 
51.
Godłowski K. 1977: Materiały do poznania kultury przeworskiej na Górnym Śląsku (część II), MSiW IV, 7–237.
 
52.
Godłowski K. 1992: Zmiany w uzbrojeniu ludności kultury przeworskiej w okresie wpływów rzymskich, [w:] M. Głosek et alii (red.), Arma et ollae. Studia dedykowane Profesorowi Andrzejowi Nadolskiemu w 70 rocznicę urodzin i 45 rocznicę pracy naukowej. Sesja naukowa, Łódź, 7–8 maja 1992 r., Łódź [SNAP], 71–88.
 
53.
Godłowski K. 1994: Die Chronologie der germanischen Waffengräber in der jüngeren und späten Kaiserzeit, [w:] C. von Carnap-Bornheim (red.), Beiträge zu römischer und barbarischer Bewaffnung in den ersten vier nachchristlichen Jahrhunderten. Akten des 2. Internationalen Kolloquiums in Marburg a.d. Lahn, 20. bis 24. Februar 1994, Veröffentlichungen des Vorgeschichtlichen Seminars Marburg Sonderbd. 8, Lublin-Marburg [Wydawnictwo UMCS], 169–178.
 
54.
Goßler N. 2013: Die mittelalterlichen Steigbügel aus dem Berliner Bestand der Prussia-Sammlung (ehemals Königsberg/Ostpreußen) – Studien zu Typologie, Chronologie und Kulturgeschichte, „Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica” 45, 109–215.
 
55.
Heydeck J. 1909: Das Gräberfeld im Kunterstrauch, Kr. Fischhausen, Prussia 22 (1900–1904), 207–216.
 
56.
Hollack E. 1893: Gräberfeld bei Viehof, Kr. Labiau, Prussia 18 (1892/93), 24–30.
 
57.
Hollack E. 1908a: Erläuterungen zur vorgeschichtlichen Übersichtskarte von Ostpreußen, Glogau-Berlin [Kommissions-Verlag von Carl Flemming, A.G.].
 
58.
Hollack E. 1908b: Die Grabformen ostpreussischer Gräberfelder, ZfE 40, 145–193.
 
59.
Homâkova O.A., Uspenskij P.S. 2015: O.A. Хомякова, П.С. Успенский, Могильник римского времени Изобильное (Klein Fliess, Kr. Labiau) в Калининградской Области: архивные данные и новые исследования, RosArh. 2015/3, 122–137.
 
60.
Ibsen T., Skvorzov K.N. 2015: Das Gräberfeld von Groß Ottenhagen/Berezovka – ein wiederentdeckter Bestattungsplatz des 1. Jahrtausends n. Chr. im Kaliningrader Gebiet, [w:] П.Г. Гайдуков (red.), Города и веси средневековой Руси. Археология, история, культура. К 60-летию Николая Андреевича Макарова, Москва-Вологда [Древности Севера], 86–102.
 
61.
Ilkjær J. 1990: Illerup Ådal 1. Die Lanzen und Speere. Textband, Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXV:1, Højbjerg [Aarhus University Press].
 
62.
Jahn M. 1916: Die Bewaffnung der Germanen in der älteren Eisenzeit etwa von 700 v. Chr. bis 200 n. Chr., Mannus-Bibliothek 16, Würzburg [Curt Kabitzsch].
 
63.
Jankuhn H. 1933: Zur Besiedlung des Samlandes in der älteren römischen Kaiserzeit, Prussia 30/I, 202–226.
 
64.
Jaskanis J. 1977: Cmentarzyska kultury zachodniobałtyjskiej z okresu rzymskiego. Materiały do badań nad obrządkiem pogrzebowym, MSiW IV, 239–349.
 
65.
Jentzsch A. 1896: Bericht über die Verwaltung des Ostpreussischen Provinzialmuseums in den Jahren 1893–1895 nebst Beiträgen zur Geologie und Urgeschichte Ost- und Westpreussens, „Schriften der Königlichen Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg” XXXVII, 49–138.
 
66.
Jentzsch A. 1900: Über die im Ostpreussischen Provinzialmuseum aufbewahrten Gewichte der jüngsten heidnischen Zeit Preussens, Prussia 21 (1896–1900), 278–289.
 
67.
Jończyk L., Gołębiewska-Tobiasz A. 2021: Zbrojni kupcy z Szurpił. Na szlaku ze Skandynawii do Bułgarii Nadwołżańskiej, Warszawa [Wydawnictwa UW].
 
68.
Kaczanowski P. 1995: Klasyfikacja grotów broni drzewcowej kultury przeworskiej z okresu rzymskiego, Klasyfikacje zabytków archeologicznych I, Kraków [IAE PAN / UJ].
 
69.
Kazakevičius V. 1996: IX–XIII a. Baltų Kalavijai, Vilnius [Alma littera].
 
70.
Kirpičnikov A.N. 2009: А.Н. Кирпичников, Раннесредневековые золоченые шлемы. Новые находки и наблюдения, Санкт-Петербург [Вести].
 
71.
Klebs R. 1877: Bericht über die neuen Ausgrabungen in Tengen bei Brandenburg (Natangen), ausgeführt im Sommer 1875, „Schriften der Königlichen Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg i. Pr.” XVII, 51–62.
 
72.
Kontny B. 2015: This came out of the swamp. Wolka See revisited: some debatable problems concerning Balt weapons, [w:] B. Kontny (red.), B. Kontny (red.), Ubi tribus faucibus fluenta Vistulae fluminis ebibuntur. Jerzy Okulicz-Kozaryn in memoriam, ŚWIATOWIT Suppl. Series B: Barbaricum 11, Warszawa [IA UW], 307–331.
 
73.
Kontny B. 2016: Siekiery tulejkowe z kultur bogaczewskiej i sudowskiej, WA LXVII, 37–64.
 
74.
Mackeprang M.B. 1943: Kulturbeziehungen im nordischen Raum des 3.–5. Jahrhunderts. Keramische Studien, Hamburger Schriften zur Vorgeschichte und Germanischen Frühgeschichte 3, Leipzig [Johann Ambrosius Barth].
 
75.
Madyda-Legutko R. 1987: Die Gürtelschnallen der römischen Kaiserzeit und der frühen Völkerwanderungszeit im mitteleuropäischen Barbaricum, B.A.R. Int. Series 360, Oxford (1986) [BAR Publishing].
 
76.
Madyda-Legutko R. 1990: Doppeldornschnallen mit rechteckigem Rahmen im europäischen Barbaricum, „Germania” 68, 551–585.
 
77.
Madyda-Legutko R. 2011: Studia nad zróżnicowaniem metalowych części pasów w kulturze przeworskiej. Okucia końca pasa, Kraków [Towarzystwo Wydawnicze „Historia Iagellonica”].
 
78.
Niewęgłowski A. 2009: Wczesnośredniowieczne zapinki podkowiaste z gwiaździstymi zakończeniami z ziem bałtyjskich, mps pracy magisterskiej, archiwum Wydziału Archeologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
 
79.
Nowakiewicz T., Wróblewski W. 2010: „Pruzzische“ und „slawische“ Keramik im frühmittelalterlichen Galinden, [w:] U. Lund Hansen, A. Bitner-Wróblewska (red.), Worlds apart? Contacts across the Baltic Sea in the Iron Age, Network Denmark-Poland, 2005–2008, Nordiske Fortidsminder C/7, København-Warszawa [Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab / PMA], 505–524.
 
80.
Nowakowski W. 1991: Kulturowy krąg zachodniobałtyjski w okresie wpływów rzymskich. Kwestia definicji podziałów wewnętrznych, [w:] [J. Okulicz red.] Ar¬cheolo¬gia bał¬tyjska. Materiały z konferencji, Olsztyn 24–25 kwiet¬nia 1988 roku, Olsztyn [Biuro Badań i Dokumentacji Zabytków / Ośrodek Badań Naukowych im. Wojciecha Kętrzyńskiego], 42–66.
 
81.
Nowakowski W. 1994: Kultura przeworska a zachodniobałtyjski krąg kulturowy, [w:] J. Gurba A. Kokowski (red.), Kultura przeworska. Materiały z konferencji, Kultura przeworska I = Lubelskie Materiały Archeologiczne VIII/1, Lublin [Wydawnictwo UMCS], 373–388.
 
82.
Nowakowski W. 1995: Od Galindai do Galinditae. Z badań nad pradziejami bałtyjskiego ludu z Pojezierza Mazurskiego, Barbaricum 4, Warszawa [IA UW].
 
83.
Nowakowski W. 1996: Das Samland in der römischen Kaiserzeit und seine Verbindungen mit dem römischen Reich und der barbarischen Welt, Veröffentlichung des Vorgeschichtlichen Seminars Marburg SonderBd. 10, Marburg-Warszawa [Philipps-Universität Marburg].
 
84.
Nowakowski W. 2001: Żelazne zapinki kuszowate z podwiniętą nóżką w europejskim Barbaricum, WA LIV (1995–1998), 129–146.
 
85.
Nowakowski W. 2013: Masuren in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Auswertung der Archivalien aus dem Nachlass von Herbert Jankuhn, Studien zur Siedlungsgeschichte und Archäologie der Ostseegebiete 12, Neumünster [Wachholtz].
 
86.
Okulicz J. 1958: Cmentarzysko z okresu rzymskiego odkryte w miejscowości Bogaczewo, na przysiółku Kula, pow. Giżycko, RO I, 47–116.
 
87.
Okulicz J. 1973: Pradzieje ziem pruskich od późnego paleolitu do VII w. n.e., Monografie Dziejów Społecznych i Politycznych Warmii i Mazur I, Wrocław [Ossolineum].
 
88.
Petersen J. 1919: De Norske Vikingesverd. En Typologisk-Kronologisk Studie Over Vikingetidens Vaaben, Videnskapsselskapets Skrifter. Il. Hist.-Filos. Klasse 1919/I, Kristiania [Jacob Dybwad].
 
89.
Prassolow J.A., Skvortsov K.N. 2016: On the Significance and Research Potential of the Grebieten Burial Ground: A Reconstruction of the Prewar State of Knowledge and the Prospects for Modern Research, „Archaeologia Baltica” 23, 81–95.
 
90.
Raddatz K. 1993: Der Wolka-See, ein Opferplatz der römischen Kaiserzeit in Ostpreußen, „Offa” 49/50 (1992/93), 127–187.
 
91.
Raddatz K. 1999: Der Dowesee bei Braunschweig, ein Opferplatz der frühen Völkerwanderungszeit in Niedersachsen, Neue Ausgrabungen und Forschungen in Niedersachsen 21, Neumünster [Wachholtz], 169–230.
 
92.
Radûš O.A., Skvorcov K.N. 2008: О.А. Радюш, К.Н. Скворцов, Находки деталей щитов в ареале самбийско-натангийской культуры, [w:] Древности Центральной и Восточной Европы эпохи римского влияния и переселения народов. Сборник материалов, Germania – Sarmatia [Калининградский областной историко-художественный музей], 122–157.
 
93.
Samokvasov D.Â. 1916: Д.Я. Самоквасов, Могильныя древности Сѣверянской Черниговщины, Москва [Синодальная Типографія].
 
94.
Schmiedehelm M. 2011: Das Gräberfeld am Jaskowska-See in Masuren. Studien zur westmasurischen Kultur der römischen Eisenzeit (red. A. Juga-Szymańska, P. Szymański), Warszawa [IA UW].
 
95.
Shiroukhov R. 2012: Prussian Graves in the Sambian Peninsula, with Imports, Weapons and Horse Harnesses, from the Tenth to the 13th Century: the Question of the Warrior Elite, „Archaeologia Baltica” 18, 224–255.
 
96.
Shiroukhov R. 2015: Contacts between Prussians and Curonians in the 11th–early 13th centuries, according to the archaeological data, [w:] S. Wadyl, M. Karczewski, M. Hoffmann (red.), Materiały do Archeologii Warmii i Mazur, tom 1, Warszawa-Białystok [IA UW / Wydział Historyczno-Socjologiczny Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku / Instytut Historii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie], 255–273.
 
97.
Skvorcov K.N. 2012: К.Н. Скворцов, Новые находки памятников римского времени на побережье Вислинского залива, [w:] От Римского Лимеса до Великой Китайской Стены, „Stratum plus” 2012/4, 107–126.
 
98.
Świętosławski W. 1990: Strzemiona średniowieczne z ziem Polski, Łódź [Instytut Historii Kultury Materialnej PAN].
 
99.
Tempelmann-Mączyńska M. 1985: Die Perlen der römischen Kaiserzeit und der frühen Phase der Völkerwanderungszeit im mitteleuropäischen Barbaricum, Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 43, Mainz am Rhein [Philipp von Zabern].
 
100.
Tischler O. 1890: Bericht ueber den Zuwachs der archäologischen Sammlung des Provinzial-Museums im Jahre 1888, [w:] Bericht über die in den Sitzungen der Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg gehaltenen Vorträge im Jahre 1889, „Schriften der Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg in Pr.” XXX (1889), 25–32.
 
101.
Tischler O. 1891: Bericht über die Archäologisch-Anthropologische Abteilung des Provinzial-Museums der Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft, „Schriften der Königlichen Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg in Pr.” XXXI (1890), 85–104.
 
102.
Tischler O., Kemke H. 1902: Ostpreussische Altertümer aus der Zeit der grossen Gräberfelder nach Christi Geburt, Königsberg i. Pr. [Wilhelm Koch].
 
103.
Woźniak M. 2013: An iron bell-shaped pendant from the cemetery of the Wielbark Culture in Kozłówko in northern Masovia, „Archaeologia Lituana” 14, 51–62.
 
104.
Wróblewski W. 2007: Aschenplätze – the forgotten burial rituals of the Old Prussians, „Archaeologia Lituana” 7, 221–234.
 
105.
Zapolska A. 2008: Römische Münzen im Westbaltischen Kulturkreis – Kontexte und Funktionen, [w:] A. Bursche, R. Ciołek (red.), Roman Coins outside the Empire. Ways and Phases, Contexts and Functions. Proceedings of the ESF/SCH Exploratory Workshop, Radziwiłł Palace, Nieborów (Poland), 3–6 September 2005, Collection Moneta 82, Warszawa-Wetteren [Moneta / UW], 179–194.
 
106.
Zapolska A. 2012: Znaleziska monet rzymskich z kręgu zachodniobałtyjskiego, mps dysertacji, archiwum Wydziału Archeologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
 
ISSN:0043-5082
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top